CHICAGO and ATLANTA, Aug. 8, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Background checks are designed to validate candidate resumes and protect employers from negligent hiring risks, but employers need to make sure they are not experiencing candidate fall off because of a poor background check experience. According to a recent CareerBuilder survey, 38 percent have lost a candidate because they had a negative experience with their background check; however, less than half of HR managers who conduct background checks (44 percent) have tested their background check experience themselves. When employers do test their process, they identify a less than ideal candidate experience, with around 1 in 6 (14 percent) rating their background check candidate experience as fair or poor.
The national survey, which was conducted online by Harris Poll on behalf of CareerBuilder from May 24 to June 16, 2017, included representative samples of 2,369 full-time employers (including 221 HR managers) and 3,462 full-time U.S. workers across industries and company sizes in the private sector.
"Employers are aware conducting background checks is an important business process, but few invest time to evaluate the candidate experience, ease of use, simplicity, and impact on the hiring process," said Ben Goldberg, CEO of Aurico. "The longer the background check process, the higher risk of losing a quality candidate to another employer. Employers should test their application and background check process and ensure candidates have a positive experience."
A Background Check Process Reflects On the Business
A negative experience with a company's HR technology (such as a job application or background check process) can affect a candidate's opinion of the company overall. Fifty-six percent of candidates think less of a company if they have a poor experience with their HR technology, and 8 percent of those who have accepted a job offer then withdrew have done so because a background check took too long or they had a negative experience with the background check/drug check.
A poorly conducted background check is one of the most common reasons employers lose candidates that have accepted job offers — 21 percent of employers who have lost candidates that have accepted a job offer say it was because background screening took too long.
Goldberg recommends these three strategies to help optimize your background check process for candidates:
- Partner with the best. Make sure your provider keeps up with compliance standards, is National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS) Accredited and provides timely communication and support to candidates.
- Check the clock. The longer the background check, the higher the risk of losing the candidate to another employer. Typically, background checks should return in less than five business days, but on average take 24-72 business hours to complete.
- Test the candidate experience. Not only is it important for employers to experience the process firsthand to make sure it is easy and straightforward, it's important to seek direct feedback from your candidates.
CareerBuilder's Background Check Division
Aurico, a CareerBuilder company, is a leading provider of background screening and drug testing serving U.S. and international clients. Aurico is a recognized leader in customer satisfaction among screening providers. Over the last 26 years, Aurico has delivered comprehensive background screening and drug-testing services, building a strong reputation for exceptional service, quality and screening technology. For more information, visit www.aurico.com.
This survey was conducted online within the U.S. by Harris Poll on behalf of CareerBuilder among 2,369 hiring and human resource managers ages 18 and over (employed full-time, not self-employed, non-government including 221 HR managers) and 3,462 employees ages 18 and over (employed full-time, not self-employed, non-government) between May 24 and June 16, 2017 (percentages for some questions are based on a subset, based on their responses to certain questions). With pure probability samples of 2,369 and 3,462, one could say with a 95 percent probability that the overall results have sampling errors of +/- 2.01 and +/- 1.67 percentage points, respectively. Sampling error for data from sub-samples is higher and varies.
CareerBuilder is a global, end-to-end human capital solutions company focused on helping employers find, hire and manage great talent. Combining advertising, software and services, CareerBuilder leads the industry in recruiting solutions, employment screening and human capital management. It also operates top job sites around the world. CareerBuilder and its subsidiaries operate in the United States, Europe, Canada and Asia. For more information, visit www.careerbuilder.com.